↓ Skip to main content

Sunlight, Vitamin D and Skin Cancer

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Sunlight, Vitamin D and Skin Cancer'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Sunlight, Ultraviolet Radiation, Vitamin D and Skin Cancer
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Vitamin D and Cancer
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Vitamin D Status and Cancer Incidence and Ms
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Solar ultraviolet irradiance and cancer incidence and mortality.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and cancer.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 The role of vitamin D for cardiovascular disease and overall mortality.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Epidemiology of skin cancer.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Histology of Melanoma and Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Cytogenetics of Melanoma and Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 The Immune System and Skin Cancer
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Human Papilloma Viruses and Skin Cancer
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Ultraviolet damage, DNA repair and vitamin D in nonmelanoma skin cancer and in malignant melanoma: an update.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Molecular Biology of Basal and Squamous Cell Carcinomas
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Solar Ultraviolet Radiation, Vitamin D and Skin Cancer Surveillance in Organ Transplant Recipients (OTRS)
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Therapy of Metastatic Malignant Melanoma
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 The Vitamin D Receptor
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Protection from Ultraviolet Damage and Photocarcinogenesis by Vitamin D Compounds
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Interaction of Hedgehog and Vitamin D Signaling Pathways in Basal Cell Carcinomas
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Solar ultraviolet exposure and mortality from skin tumors.
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Ultraviolet radiation and cutaneous malignant melanoma.
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Sun exposure and melanomas on sun-shielded and sun-exposed body areas.
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Sunlight, vitamin D and malignant melanoma: an update.
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Ultraviolet Exposure Scenarios
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Solar Ultraviolet Exposure and Mortality from Skin Tumors
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Sunscreens.
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Sunscreens in the United States
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Health Initiatives for the Prevention of Skin Cancer
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Optimal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels for multiple health outcomes.
Attention for Chapter 5: Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and cancer.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and cancer.
Chapter number 5
Book title
Sunlight, Vitamin D and Skin Cancer
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-0437-2_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-0436-5, 978-1-4939-0437-2
Authors

Gandini S, Gnagnarella P, Serrano D, Pasquali E, Raimondi S, Sara Gandini, Patrizia Gnagnarella, Davide Serrano, Elena Pasquali, Sara Raimondi, Gandini, Sara, Gnagnarella, Patrizia, Serrano, Davide, Pasquali, Elena, Raimondi, Sara

Abstract

It was suggested that vitamin D levels influence cancer development. The vitamin D receptor (VDR) is a crucial mediator for the cellular effects of vitamin D. In fact It has been hypothesized that polymorphisms in the VDR gene affect cancer risk and the relevance of VDR gene restriction fragment length polymorphisms for various types of cancer has been investigated by a great number of studies. However, results from previous studies on the association of VDR polymorphisms with different cancer types are somewhat contradictory, and the role of VDR in the etiology of cancer is still equivocal. We have performed a systematic review of the literature to analyze the relevance of more VDR polymorphisms (Fok1, Bsm1, Taq1, Apa1, and Cdx2) for individual malignancies, including cancer of the skin (melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer), ovarian cancer, renal cell carcinoma, bladder cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, leukemia, thyroid carcinoma, esophageal adenocarcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, sarcoma, head and neck and oral squamous cell carcinoma. Up to June 2012, we identified 79 independent studies for a total of 52427 cases and 62225 controls. Significant associations with VDR polymorphisms have been reported for prostate (Fok1, Bsm1, Taq1), breast (Fok1, Bsm1, Apa1), colon-rectum (Fok1, Bsm1, Taq1) and skin cancer (Fok1, Bsm1, Taq1). Very few studies reported risk estimates for the other cancer sites. Conflicting data have been reported for most malignancies and at present it is still not possible to make any definitive statements about the importance of the VDR genotype for cancer risk. It seems probable that interactions with other factors such as calcium and vitamin D intake, 25(OH)D plasma levels and UV radiation exposure play a decisive role in cancer risk. To conclude, there is some indication that VDR polymorphisms may modulate the risk of some cancer sites and in future studies VDR genetic variation should be integrated also with prediagnostic indicator of vitamin D status.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 90 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 27 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 31 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2015.
All research outputs
#14,200,249
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,092
of 4,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,879
of 238,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#19
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.