↓ Skip to main content

Designing the next generation of medicines for malaria control and eradication

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
240 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
398 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Designing the next generation of medicines for malaria control and eradication
Published in
Malaria Journal, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-12-187
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeremy N Burrows, Rob Hooft van Huijsduijnen, Jörg J Möhrle, Claude Oeuvray, Timothy NC Wells

Abstract

In the fight against malaria new medicines are an essential weapon. For the parts of the world where the current gold standard artemisinin combination therapies are active, significant improvements can still be made: for example combination medicines which allow for single dose regimens, cheaper, safer and more effective medicines, or improved stability under field conditions. For those parts of the world where the existing combinations show less than optimal activity, the priority is to have activity against emerging resistant strains, and other criteria take a secondary role. For new medicines to be optimal in malaria control they must also be able to reduce transmission and prevent relapse of dormant forms: additional constraints on a combination medicine. In the absence of a highly effective vaccine, new medicines are also needed to protect patient populations. In this paper, an outline definition of the ideal and minimally acceptable characteristics of the types of clinical candidate molecule which are needed (target candidate profiles) is suggested. In addition, the optimal and minimally acceptable characteristics of combination medicines are outlined (target product profiles). MMV presents now a suggested framework for combining the new candidates to produce the new medicines. Sustained investment over the next decade in discovery and development of new molecules is essential to enable the long-term delivery of the medicines needed to combat malaria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 398 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 387 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 18%
Researcher 67 17%
Student > Master 65 16%
Student > Bachelor 31 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 6%
Other 67 17%
Unknown 73 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 20%
Chemistry 65 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 35 9%
Other 46 12%
Unknown 88 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,495,793
of 24,580,204 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#516
of 5,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,980
of 201,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#6
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,580,204 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.