You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Search for 22Na in novae supported by a novel method for measuring femtosecond nuclear lifetimes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, September 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-023-40121-3 |
| Authors |
Chloé Fougères, François de Oliveira Santos, Jordi José, Caterina Michelagnoli, Emmanuel Clément, Yung Hee Kim, Antoine Lemasson, Valdir Guimarães, Diego Barrientos, Daniel Bemmerer, Giovanna Benzoni, Andrew J. Boston, Roman Böttger, Florent Boulay, Angela Bracco, Igor Čeliković, Bo Cederwall, Michał Ciemala, Clément Delafosse, César Domingo-Pardo, Jérémie Dudouet, Jürgen Eberth, Zsolt Fülöp, Vicente González, Andrea Gottardo, Johan Goupil, Herbert Hess, Andrea Jungclaus, Ayşe Kaşkaş, Amel Korichi, Silvia M. Lenzi, Silvia Leoni, Hongjie Li, Joa Ljungvall, Araceli Lopez-Martens, Roberto Menegazzo, Daniele Mengoni, Benedicte Million, Jaromír Mrázek, Daniel R. Napoli, Alahari Navin, Johan Nyberg, Zsolt Podolyák, Alberto Pullia, Begoña Quintana, Damien Ralet, Nadine Redon, Peter Reiter, Kseniia Rezynkina, Frédéric Saillant, Marie-Delphine Salsac, Angel M. Sánchez-Benítez, Enrique Sanchis, Menekşe Şenyiğit, Marco Siciliano, Nadezda A. Smirnova, Dorottya Sohler, Mihai Stanoiu, Christophe Theisen, Jose J. Valiente-Dobón, Predrag Ujić, Magdalena Zielińska |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 50% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 50% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 25% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2023.
All research outputs
#19,213,908
of 24,464,848 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#48,352
of 52,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,289
of 207,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1,103
of 1,286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,464,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52,527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.