↓ Skip to main content

The plasticity of the grapevine berry transcriptome

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
13 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The plasticity of the grapevine berry transcriptome
Published in
Genome Biology, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/gb-2013-14-6-r54
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvia Dal Santo, Giovanni Battista Tornielli, Sara Zenoni, Marianna Fasoli, Lorenzo Farina, Andrea Anesi, Flavia Guzzo, Massimo Delledonne, Mario Pezzotti

Abstract

Phenotypic plasticity refers to the range of phenotypes a single genotype can express as a function of its environment. These phenotypic variations are attributable to the effect of the environment on the expression and function of genes influencing plastic traits. We investigated phenotypic plasticity in grapevine by comparing the berry transcriptome in a single clone of the vegetatively-propagated common grapevine species Vitis vinifera cultivar Corvina through 3 consecutive growth years cultivated in 11 different vineyards in the Verona area of Italy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 205 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 56 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 8%
Other 14 6%
Student > Master 14 6%
Other 38 18%
Unknown 23 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 142 66%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 9%
Chemistry 5 2%
Environmental Science 5 2%
Engineering 3 1%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 31 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2014.
All research outputs
#552,785
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#323
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,970
of 209,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#7
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.