You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Increased consumption of fruit and vegetables for the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009874.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Louise Hartley, Ewemade Igbinedion, Jennifer Holmes, Nadine Flowers, Margaret Thorogood, Aileen Clarke, Saverio Stranges, Lee Hooper, Karen Rees |
| Abstract |
There is increasing evidence that high consumption of fruit and vegetables is beneficial for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 14% |
| United States | 10 | 12% |
| Spain | 8 | 10% |
| Colombia | 3 | 4% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Virgin Islands, U.S. | 1 | 1% |
| Cambodia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 37 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 59 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 25% |
| Scientists | 4 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 963 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 948 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 156 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 152 | 16% |
| Researcher | 98 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 83 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 50 | 5% |
| Other | 162 | 17% |
| Unknown | 262 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 248 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 132 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 66 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 36 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 3% |
| Other | 147 | 15% |
| Unknown | 303 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#393,359
of 25,848,323 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#653
of 13,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,693
of 210,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,848,323 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.