↓ Skip to main content

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation following botulinum toxin and other focal intramuscular treatment for post-stroke spasticity

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
378 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multidisciplinary rehabilitation following botulinum toxin and other focal intramuscular treatment for post-stroke spasticity
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009689.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marina Demetrios, Fary Khan, Lynne Turner-Stokes, Caroline Brand, Shane McSweeney

Abstract

Spasticity may affect stroke survivors by contributing to activity limitations, caregiver burden, pain and reduced quality of life (QoL). Spasticity management guidelines recommend multidisciplinary (MD) rehabilitation programmes following botulinum toxin (BoNT) treatment for post-stroke spasticity. However, the evidence base for the effectiveness of MD rehabilitation is unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 378 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 369 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 86 23%
Researcher 51 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 12%
Student > Bachelor 42 11%
Other 26 7%
Other 80 21%
Unknown 48 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 135 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 67 18%
Neuroscience 27 7%
Social Sciences 26 7%
Psychology 18 5%
Other 44 12%
Unknown 61 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#1,318,932
of 12,962,154 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,866
of 10,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,184
of 150,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,962,154 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.