↓ Skip to main content

Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing burn wound infection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
37 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
351 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing burn wound infection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008738.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leticia A Barajas-Nava, Jesús López-Alcalde, Marta Roqué i Figuls, Ivan Solà, Xavier Bonfill Cosp

Abstract

Infection of burn wounds is a serious problem because it can delay healing, increase scarring and invasive infection may result in the death of the patient. Antibiotic prophylaxis is one of several interventions that may prevent burn wound infection and protect the burned patient from invasive infections.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 351 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 338 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 63 18%
Student > Bachelor 48 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 11%
Other 38 11%
Student > Postgraduate 37 11%
Other 90 26%
Unknown 36 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 187 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 4%
Psychology 8 2%
Other 40 11%
Unknown 55 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2020.
All research outputs
#572,180
of 14,242,710 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,680
of 10,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,610
of 153,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,242,710 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,910 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.