↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
Critical Care, January 2004
DOI 10.1186/cc2985
Pubmed ID
Authors

Howard E Corey

Abstract

Complex acid-base disorders arise frequently in critically ill patients, especially in those with multiorgan failure. In order to diagnose and treat these disorders better, some intensivists have abandoned traditional theories in favor of revisionist models of acid-base balance. With claimed superiority over the traditional approach, the new methods have rekindled debate over the fundamental principles of acid-base physiology. In order to shed light on this controversy, we review the derivation and application of new models of acid-base balance.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Italy 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 122 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 26 20%
Student > Postgraduate 23 17%
Researcher 22 17%
Professor 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Other 28 21%
Unknown 7 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 81%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 6 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2020.
All research outputs
#9,965,153
of 16,221,224 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,984
of 5,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,122
of 158,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#57
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,221,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.