↓ Skip to main content

Socioeconomic disparity in cervical cancer screening among Korean women: 1998–2010

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Socioeconomic disparity in cervical cancer screening among Korean women: 1998–2010
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-553
Pubmed ID
Authors

Minjee Lee, Eun-Cheol Park, Hoo-Sun Chang, Jeoung A Kwon, Ki Bong Yoo, Tae Hyun Kim

Abstract

Cervical cancer is the sixth most common cause of cancer among Korean women and is one of the most preventable cancers in the world. This study aimed to investigate the change in cervical cancer screening rates, the level of socioeconomic disparities in cervical cancer screening participation, and whether there was a reduction in these disparities between 1998 and 2010.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 23%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 17 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 19%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 19 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2013.
All research outputs
#15,473,159
of 24,987,787 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,224
of 16,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,567
of 202,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#194
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,987,787 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.