↓ Skip to main content

Which Small Molecule? Selecting Chemical Probes for Use in Cancer Research and Target Validation

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Discovery, September 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
49 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Which Small Molecule? Selecting Chemical Probes for Use in Cancer Research and Target Validation
Published in
Cancer Discovery, September 2023
DOI 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-23-0536
Authors

Mary M. Mader, Joachim Rudolph, Ingo V. Hartung, David Uehling, Paul Workman, William Zuercher

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,349,262
of 24,484,013 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#663
of 3,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,790
of 194,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#11
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,484,013 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.