You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Unusual fatal multiple-organ dysfunction and pancreatitis induced by a single wasp sting
Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases, January 2011
C Azad, VR Parmar, KR Jat
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Lecturer > Senior Lecturer||1||11%|
|Student > Master||1||11%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||5||56%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||1||11%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,461,214 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases
of 492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 188,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,461,214 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.