↓ Skip to main content

Ginkgo biloba for intermittent claudication

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
11 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ginkgo biloba for intermittent claudication
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006888.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saskia PA Nicolaï, Lotte M Kruidenier, Bianca LW Bendermacher, Martin H Prins, Rutger A Stokmans, Pieter PHL Broos, Joep AW Teijink

Abstract

People with intermittent claudication (IC) suffer from pain in the muscles of the leg occurring during exercise which is relieved by a short period of rest. Symptomatic relief can be achieved by (supervised) exercise therapy and pharmacological treatments. Ginkgo biloba is a vasoactive agent and is used to treat IC.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Romania 1 1%
Unknown 96 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 22%
Student > Bachelor 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 16 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2017.
All research outputs
#921,794
of 14,123,515 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,814
of 10,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,210
of 152,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,123,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.