↓ Skip to main content

Ginkgo biloba for intermittent claudication

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
11 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ginkgo biloba for intermittent claudication
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006888.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saskia PA Nicolaï, Lotte M Kruidenier, Bianca LW Bendermacher, Martin H Prins, Rutger A Stokmans, Pieter PHL Broos, Joep AW Teijink

Abstract

People with intermittent claudication (IC) suffer from pain in the muscles of the leg occurring during exercise which is relieved by a short period of rest. Symptomatic relief can be achieved by (supervised) exercise therapy and pharmacological treatments. Ginkgo biloba is a vasoactive agent and is used to treat IC.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 134 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 23%
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 22 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 25 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,202,810
of 17,183,399 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,164
of 11,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,209
of 163,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,183,399 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.