↓ Skip to main content

The environment within: how gut microbiota may influence metabolism and body composition

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 tweeters
patent
20 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
171 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
533 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The environment within: how gut microbiota may influence metabolism and body composition
Published in
Diabetologia, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00125-010-1662-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Vrieze, F. Holleman, E. G. Zoetendal, W. M. de Vos, J. B. L. Hoekstra, M. Nieuwdorp

Abstract

Obesity, diabetes and consequently atherosclerotic vascular disease have become major health and public health issues worldwide. The increasing and staggering prevalence of obesity might not only be explained by nutritional habits or the reduction of energy expenditure through decreased physical activity. In addition, recent studies have focused on intestinal microbiota as environmental factors that increase energy yield from diet, regulate peripheral metabolism and thereby increase body weight. Obesity is associated with substantial changes in composition and metabolic function of gut microbiota, but the pathophysiological processes driving this bidirectional relationship have not been fully elucidated. This review discusses the relationships between the following: composition of gut microbiota, energy extracted from diet, synthesis of gut hormones involved in energy homeostasis, production of butyrate and the regulation of fat storage.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 533 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 2%
Spain 6 1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 492 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 106 20%
Student > Master 106 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 99 19%
Student > Bachelor 70 13%
Student > Postgraduate 29 5%
Other 123 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 206 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 147 28%
Unspecified 42 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 24 5%
Other 81 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2018.
All research outputs
#779,879
of 13,459,952 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#473
of 3,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,037
of 151,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#7
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,459,952 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.