↓ Skip to main content

Avian erythrocytes have functional mitochondria, opening novel perspectives for birds as animal models in the study of ageing

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Zoology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Avian erythrocytes have functional mitochondria, opening novel perspectives for birds as animal models in the study of ageing
Published in
Frontiers in Zoology, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1742-9994-10-33
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antoine Stier, Pierre Bize, Quentin Schull, Joffrey Zoll, François Singh, Bernard Geny, Frédéric Gros, Cathy Royer, Sylvie Massemin, François Criscuolo

Abstract

In contrast to mammalian erythrocytes, which have lost their nucleus and mitochondria during maturation, the erythrocytes of almost all other vertebrate species are nucleated throughout their lifespan. Little research has been done however to test for the presence and functionality of mitochondria in these cells, especially for birds. Here, we investigated those two points in erythrocytes of one common avian model: the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata).

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 160 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 21%
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Student > Master 20 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 33 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 12%
Environmental Science 16 10%
Unspecified 5 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 35 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,002,288
of 23,803,225 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Zoology
#127
of 666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,762
of 285,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Zoology
#8
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,803,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.