↓ Skip to main content

Water resources of Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Water resources of Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana
Published in
US Geological Survey, January 2017
DOI 10.3133/fs20163066
Authors

White, Vincent E., Prakken, Lawrence B., Vincent E. White, Lawrence B. Prakken

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2017.
All research outputs
#6,785,107
of 8,903,958 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#782
of 929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,380
of 302,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#93
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,903,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.