↓ Skip to main content

Fire regimes and the conservation of sandstone heath in monsoonal northern Australia: frequency, interval, patchiness

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, March 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Fire regimes and the conservation of sandstone heath in monsoonal northern Australia: frequency, interval, patchiness
Published in
Biological Conservation, March 2002
DOI 10.1016/s0006-3207(01)00157-4
Authors

Jeremy Russell-Smith, Paul G Ryan, David C Cheal

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
United Arab Emirates 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
China 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Unknown 67 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 22%
Student > Master 10 14%
Professor 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Other 17 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 35 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 32%
Unspecified 4 5%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 5%
Other 3 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2004.
All research outputs
#3,504,867
of 12,238,739 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,905
of 3,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,724
of 334,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#59
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,238,739 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.