The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 291 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Multidisciplinary expert panel report on fluid stewardship: perspectives and practice
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, September 2023
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13613-023-01177-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Manu L. N. G. Malbrain, Pietro Caironi, Robert G. Hahn, Juan V. Llau, Marcia McDougall, Luís Patrão, Emily Ridley, Alan Timmins |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 45 | 15% |
Spain | 12 | 4% |
Ecuador | 11 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 10 | 3% |
United States | 9 | 3% |
Colombia | 9 | 3% |
Peru | 8 | 3% |
France | 4 | 1% |
Italy | 4 | 1% |
Other | 38 | 13% |
Unknown | 141 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 243 | 84% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 30 | 10% |
Scientists | 13 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 2 | 12% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 12% |
Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Researcher | 1 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 10 | 59% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 47% |
Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 175. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2024.
All research outputs
#249,484
of 26,760,626 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#22
of 1,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,611
of 368,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#2
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,760,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.