↓ Skip to main content

Challenges to evaluating complex interventions: a content analysis of published papers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
184 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
372 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Challenges to evaluating complex interventions: a content analysis of published papers
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-568
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica Datta, Mark Petticrew

Abstract

There is continuing interest among practitioners, policymakers and researchers in the evaluation of complex interventions stemming from the need to further develop the evidence base on the effectiveness of healthcare and public health interventions, and an awareness that evaluation becomes more challenging if interventions are complex.We undertook an analysis of published journal articles in order to identify aspects of complexity described by writers, the fields in which complex interventions are being evaluated and the challenges experienced in design, implementation and evaluation. This paper outlines the findings of this documentary analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 372 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 9 2%
Spain 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 354 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 76 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 16%
Student > Master 44 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 7%
Student > Bachelor 22 6%
Other 73 20%
Unknown 70 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 53 14%
Social Sciences 48 13%
Psychology 28 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Other 52 14%
Unknown 83 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,178,036
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,873
of 17,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,508
of 214,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#55
of 270 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 270 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.