You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
The effectiveness of learning strategies for the development of Emotional Intelligence in undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review protocol
Nurse Education in Practice, October 2023
Francesca Napolitano, Michela Calzolari, Nicola Pagnucci, Milko Zanini, Gianluca Catania, Giuseppe Aleo, Lisa Gomes, Loredana Sasso, Annamaria Bagnasco
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||17||37%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||15||33%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||2%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||1||9%|
|Student > Bachelor||1||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Business, Management and Accounting||1||9%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,960,237 outputs
Outputs from Nurse Education in Practice
of 1,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 338,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nurse Education in Practice
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,960,237 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.