↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology (Online Edition), January 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
patent
6 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
1004 Mendeley
citeulike
15 CiteULike
connotea
5 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
Genome Biology (Online Edition), January 2003
DOI 10.1186/gb-2003-5-1-r1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anton J Enright, Bino John, Ulrike Gaul, Thomas Tuschl, Chris Sander, Debora S Marks

Abstract

The recent discoveries of microRNA (miRNA) genes and characterization of the first few target genes regulated by miRNAs in Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster have set the stage for elucidation of a novel network of regulatory control. We present a computational method for whole-genome prediction of miRNA target genes. The method is validated using known examples. For each miRNA, target genes are selected on the basis of three properties: sequence complementarity using a position-weighted local alignment algorithm, free energies of RNA-RNA duplexes, and conservation of target sites in related genomes. Application to the D. melanogaster, Drosophila pseudoobscura and Anopheles gambiae genomes identifies several hundred target genes potentially regulated by one or more known miRNAs.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,004 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 20 2%
United Kingdom 12 1%
Germany 7 <1%
France 5 <1%
Italy 5 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Turkey 2 <1%
Other 26 3%
Unknown 917 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 304 30%
Researcher 232 23%
Student > Master 138 14%
Student > Bachelor 72 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 46 5%
Other 158 16%
Unknown 54 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 562 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 183 18%
Computer Science 68 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 3%
Neuroscience 15 1%
Other 56 6%
Unknown 86 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,006,826
of 13,145,206 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#1,061
of 2,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#974,514
of 12,528,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#1,061
of 2,936 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,145,206 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,528,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,936 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.