↓ Skip to main content

Identification of pathways directly regulated by SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE during vegetative and reproductive development in Arabidopsis

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology (Online Edition), June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of pathways directly regulated by SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE during vegetative and reproductive development in Arabidopsis
Published in
Genome Biology (Online Edition), June 2013
DOI 10.1186/gb-2013-14-6-r56
Pubmed ID
Authors

Veronica Gregis, Fernando Andrés, Alice Sessa, Rosalinda F Guerra, Sara Simonini, Julieta L Mateos, Stefano Torti, Federico Zambelli, Gian Marco Prazzoli, Katrine N Bjerkan, Paul E Grini, Giulio Pavesi, Lucia Colombo, George Coupland, Martin M Kater

Abstract

MADS-domain transcription factors play important roles during plant development. The Arabidopsis MADS-box gene SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE (SVP) is a key regulator of two developmental phases. It functions as a repressor of the floral transition during the vegetative phase and later it contributes to the specification of floral meristems. How these distinct activities are conferred by a single transcription factor is unclear, but interactions with other MADS domain proteins which specify binding to different genomic regions is likely one mechanism.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 134 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 26%
Researcher 27 20%
Student > Master 22 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Professor 7 5%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 14 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 88 65%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 22%
Chemistry 1 <1%
Engineering 1 <1%
Unknown 16 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2016.
All research outputs
#3,018,321
of 17,364,317 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#2,105
of 3,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,543
of 163,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#21
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,364,317 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.