↓ Skip to main content

Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008933.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Graziella Filippini, Cinzia Del Giovane, Laura Vacchi, Roberto D'Amico, Carlo Di Pietrantonj, Deirdre Beecher, Georgia Salanti

Abstract

Different therapeutic strategies are available for treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) including immunosuppressants, immunomodulators, and monoclonal antibodies. Their relative effectiveness in the prevention of relapse or disability progression is unclear due to the limited number of direct comparison trials. A summary of the results, including both direct and indirect comparisons of treatment effects, may help to clarify the above uncertainty.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 2%
Spain 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 193 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 42 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 14%
Student > Master 30 14%
Other 28 13%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Other 55 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 106 51%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 9%
Unspecified 18 9%
Psychology 11 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 5%
Other 44 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2017.
All research outputs
#537,665
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,704
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,413
of 148,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.