You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What is the evidence that gender affects access to and use of forest assets for food security? A systematic map protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-016-0080-9 |
| Authors |
Linley Chiwona-Karltun, Ngolia Kimanzu, Jessica Clendenning, Johanna Bergman Lodin, Chad Ellingson, Gun Lidestav, David Mkwambisi, Esther Mwangi, Isilda Nhantumbo, Caroline Ochieng, Gillian Petrokofsky, Murat Sartas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 18% |
| Canada | 2 | 9% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Zambia | 1 | 5% |
| Lebanon | 1 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 86% |
| Scientists | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 26 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 19% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 30 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,310,909
of 24,713,766 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#94
of 318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,966
of 428,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,713,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.