↓ Skip to main content

Antibacterial activity of traditional medicinal plants used by Haudenosaunee peoples of New York State

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antibacterial activity of traditional medicinal plants used by Haudenosaunee peoples of New York State
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, November 2010
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-10-64
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frank M Frey, Ryan Meyers

Abstract

The evolution and spread of antibiotic resistance, as well as the evolution of new strains of disease causing agents, is of great concern to the global health community. Our ability to effectively treat disease is dependent on the development of new pharmaceuticals, and one potential source of novel drugs is traditional medicine. This study explores the antibacterial properties of plants used in Haudenosaunee traditional medicine. We tested the hypothesis that extracts from Haudenosaunee medicinal plants used to treat symptoms often caused by bacterial infection would show antibacterial properties in laboratory assays, and that these extracts would be more effective against moderately virulent bacteria than less virulent bacteria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 139 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 19%
Student > Bachelor 23 16%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Master 13 9%
Other 12 9%
Other 31 22%
Unknown 21 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 11%
Chemistry 13 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 31 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2024.
All research outputs
#14,431,706
of 25,107,281 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,499
of 3,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,087
of 106,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#9
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,107,281 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.