↓ Skip to main content

Conservative interventions for treating exercise‐related musculotendinous, ligamentous and osseous groin pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
460 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conservative interventions for treating exercise‐related musculotendinous, ligamentous and osseous groin pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009565.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matheus O Almeida, Brenda NG Silva, Régis B Andriolo, Álvaro N Atallah, Maria S Peccin

Abstract

Musculoskeletal, ligamentous and osseous groin injuries are common in athletes and may result in a delay of several months to resume sports. Even then, this may not be at the former level of sport activity. The treatment of exercise-related groin pain is mainly conservative (non-surgical), using interventions such as exercises, electrotherapy, manual therapy and steroid injections.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 460 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 451 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 85 18%
Student > Bachelor 73 16%
Student > Postgraduate 38 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 6%
Other 73 16%
Unknown 127 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 139 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 73 16%
Sports and Recreations 38 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 3%
Social Sciences 13 3%
Other 36 8%
Unknown 146 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,832,337
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,952
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,196
of 210,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#93
of 300 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 300 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.