You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Creatine for treating muscle disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004760.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rudolf A Kley, Mark A Tarnopolsky, Matthias Vorgerd |
| Abstract |
Progressive muscle weakness is a main symptom of most hereditary and acquired muscle diseases. Creatine improves muscle performance in healthy individuals. This is an update of our 2007 Cochrane review that evaluated creatine treatment in muscle disorders. Previous updates were in 2009 and 2011. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 27% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 262 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 12% |
| Researcher | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 56 | 21% |
| Unknown | 75 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 13 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 48 | 18% |
| Unknown | 84 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#648,477
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,185
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,748
of 210,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.