| Title |
A scoping review of ‘Pacing’ for management of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS): lessons learned for the long COVID pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12967-023-04587-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nilihan E. M. Sanal-Hayes, Marie Mclaughlin, Lawrence D. Hayes, Jacqueline L. Mair, Jane Ormerod, David Carless, Natalie Hilliard, Rachel Meach, Joanne Ingram, Nicholas F. Sculthorpe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 79% |
| Scientists | 5 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
| Librarian | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,763,378
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#329
of 4,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,815
of 361,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#16
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.