↓ Skip to main content

Opioid antagonists for smoking cessation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Opioid antagonists for smoking cessation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003086.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sean P David, Tim Lancaster, Lindsay F Stead, A. Eden Evins, Judith J Prochaska

Abstract

The reinforcing properties of nicotine may be mediated through release of various neurotransmitters both centrally and systemically. People who smoke report positive effects such as pleasure, arousal, and relaxation as well as relief of negative affect, tension, and anxiety. Opioid (narcotic) antagonists are of particular interest to investigators as potential agents to attenuate the rewarding effects of cigarette smoking.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 156 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 16%
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Other 35 22%
Unknown 29 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 38%
Psychology 26 16%
Social Sciences 15 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 31 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,411,806
of 17,349,416 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,582
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,125
of 163,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,349,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.