Brian R. Pauw, Glen J. Smales, Andy S. Anker, Venkatasamy Annadurai, Daniel M. Balazs, Ralf Bienert, Wim G. Bouwman, Ingo Breßler, Joachim Breternitz, Erik S. Brok, Gary Bryant, Andrew J. Clulow, Erin R. Crater, Frédéric De Geuser, Alessandra Del Giudice, Jérôme Deumer, Sabrina Disch, Shankar Dutt, Kilian Frank, Emiliano Fratini, Paulo R. A. F. Garcia, Elliot P. Gilbert, Marc B. Hahn, James Hallett, Max Hohenschutz, Martin Hollamby, Steven Huband, Jan Ilavsky, Johanna K. Jochum, Mikkel Juelsholt, Bradley W. Mansel, Paavo Penttilä, Rebecca K. Pittkowski, Giuseppe Portale, Lilo D. Pozzo, Leonhard Rochels, Julian M. Rosalie, Patrick E. J. Saloga, Susanne Seibt, Andrew J. Smith, Gregory N. Smith, Glenn A. Spiering, Tomasz M. Stawski, Olivier Taché, Andreas F. Thünemann, Kristof Toth, Andrew E. Whitten, Joachim Wuttke
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,839,017
of 26,563,746 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Crystallography (Wiley-Blackwell)
#31
of 2,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,546
of 375,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Crystallography (Wiley-Blackwell)
#1
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,563,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,889 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
