The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Lessons from the pandemic: new best practices in selecting molecular diagnostics for point-of-care testing of infectious diseases in sub-Saharan Africa
|
---|---|
Published in |
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, November 2023
|
DOI | 10.1080/14737159.2023.2277368 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mamadu Baldeh, Flavia K. Bawa, Faiza U. Bawah, Martin Chamai, Francis Dzabeng, Waleed M.A. Jebreel, Jean-Bertin B. Kabuya, Shola K. Molemodile Dele-Olowu, Erick Odoyo, Dimbintsoa Rakotomalala Robinson, Aubrey J. Cunnington |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
United States | 1 | 5% |
Ghana | 1 | 5% |
Sierra Leone | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 16 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 11 | 50% |
Members of the public | 10 | 45% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 43% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 2 | 29% |
Materials Science | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,288,631
of 25,367,237 outputs
Outputs from Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics
#37
of 1,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,012
of 356,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,367,237 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,051 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.