↓ Skip to main content

Drug treatment for faecal incontinence in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Drug treatment for faecal incontinence in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002116.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muhammad Imran Omar, Cameron Edwin Alexander

Abstract

Faecal incontinence (leakage of bowel motions or stool) is a common symptom which causes significant distress and reduces quality of life.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 140 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 21%
Researcher 28 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Unspecified 15 10%
Other 36 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 48%
Unspecified 20 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 13%
Psychology 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Other 21 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,188,874
of 12,923,750 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,949
of 10,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,726
of 150,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,923,750 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,414 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.