↓ Skip to main content

Data cleaning methodology for monthly water-to-oil and water-to-gas production ratios in continuous resource assessments

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Data cleaning methodology for monthly water-to-oil and water-to-gas production ratios in continuous resource assessments
Published in
US Geological Survey, January 2017
DOI 10.3133/ofr20161204
Authors

Varela, Brian A., Haines, Seth S., Gianoutsos, Nicholas J., Brian A. Varela, Seth S. Haines, Nicholas J. Gianoutsos

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2017.
All research outputs
#13,176,360
of 22,940,083 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#1,098
of 2,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,383
of 420,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#161
of 407 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,940,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 407 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.