↓ Skip to main content

Electrical stimulation with non-implanted electrodes for urinary incontinence in men

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Electrical stimulation with non-implanted electrodes for urinary incontinence in men
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001202.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bary Berghmans, Erik Hendriks, Arnold Bernards, Rob de Bie, Muhammad Imran Omar

Abstract

Electrical stimulation with non-implanted devices is used for patients with different types of urinary incontinence and symptoms of urgency, frequency and nocturia. The current review focused on electrical stimulation with non-implanted devices for the treatment of urinary incontinence in men.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 104 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 21%
Student > Master 20 19%
Student > Postgraduate 10 10%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 16 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 18%
Sports and Recreations 5 5%
Psychology 4 4%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 18 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2013.
All research outputs
#7,860,093
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,857
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,952
of 149,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#101
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.