↓ Skip to main content

Stent Retriever Use for Retrieval of Displaced Microcoils: A Consecutive Case Series

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Neuroradiology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stent Retriever Use for Retrieval of Displaced Microcoils: A Consecutive Case Series
Published in
American Journal of Neuroradiology, June 2013
DOI 10.3174/ajnr.a3552
Pubmed ID
Authors

T.M. Leslie-Mazwi, M. Heddier, H. Nordmeyer, M. Stauder, A. Velasco, P.J. Mosimann, R. Chapot

Abstract

Coil displacement during endovascular coiling procedures may require coil retrieval in the context of flow limitation or thromboembolic risk. No standard recommended method of coil retrieval exists. We present a consecutive series of 14 patients with displaced coil during aneurysm coiling in whom the complication was effectively managed with the use of a stent retriever system. Two illustrative cases from the 14 are described, and technical notes are detailed regarding use of the technique. The use of stent retrievers presents a simple, safe, and effective choice for removal of prolapsed coils during aneurysm coiling.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 31%
Other 3 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 62%
Unspecified 5 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2019.
All research outputs
#6,723,163
of 13,361,190 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#1,325
of 3,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,530
of 152,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#12
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,361,190 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,370 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.