You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Guidelines and protocols for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in children and adults with congenital heart disease: SCMR expert consensus group on congenital heart disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-15-51 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sohrab Fratz, Taylor Chung, Gerald F Greil, Margaret M Samyn, Andrew M Taylor, Emanuela R Valsangiacomo Buechel, Shi-Joon Yoo, Andrew J Powell |
| Abstract |
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has taken on an increasingly important role in the diagnostic evaluation and pre-procedural planning for patients with congenital heart disease. This article provides guidelines for the performance of CMR in children and adults with congenital heart disease. The first portion addresses preparation for the examination and safety issues, the second describes the primary techniques used in an examination, and the third provides disease-specific protocols. Variations in practice are highlighted and expert consensus recommendations are provided. Indications and appropriate use criteria for CMR examination are not specifically addressed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 38% |
| Italy | 2 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 418 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 409 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 72 | 17% |
| Other | 70 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 45 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 8% |
| Other | 84 | 20% |
| Unknown | 76 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 241 | 58% |
| Engineering | 34 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 6% |
| Unknown | 92 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,232,760
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#254
of 1,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,614
of 209,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.