↓ Skip to main content

High versus low positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels for mechanically ventilated adult patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High versus low positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels for mechanically ventilated adult patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009098.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberto Santa Cruz, Juan Ignacio Rojas, Rolando Nervi, Roberto Heredia, Agustín Ciapponi

Abstract

Mortality in patients with acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains high. These patients require mechanical ventilation, but this modality has been associated with ventilator-induced lung injury. High levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) could reduce this condition and improve patient survival.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 209 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 14%
Other 26 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Student > Master 22 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 10%
Other 63 29%
Unknown 31 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 131 61%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Psychology 3 1%
Engineering 2 <1%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 42 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,751,223
of 16,022,197 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,469
of 11,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,565
of 158,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,022,197 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.