↓ Skip to main content

Green and black tea for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
23 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
61 tweeters
facebook
13 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users
video
4 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Green and black tea for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009934.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louise Hartley, Nadine Flowers, Jennifer Holmes, Aileen Clarke, Saverio Stranges, Lee Hooper, Karen Rees

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that both green and black tea are beneficial for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 233 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 20%
Student > Bachelor 40 16%
Researcher 32 13%
Unspecified 30 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 12%
Other 65 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 38%
Unspecified 44 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 5%
Other 47 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 276. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2019.
All research outputs
#44,724
of 13,613,447 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#89
of 10,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#435
of 152,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,613,447 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.