You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Locality difference in the frequency of asymmetric shell marking type of the Manila clam Ruditapes philippinarum
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2331/suisan.79.190 |
| Authors |
SEINEN CHOW, TOSHIHIRO YAMAMOTO, KAZUTOSHI WATANABE, YUICHIRO FUJINAMI, MASAEI KANEMATSU, NATSUKI HASEGAWA, HIROSHI OKAMURA, KOJI MIZUTA, DAI MIYAWAKI, YASUFUMI HADA, IZUMI SAKURAI, NOBORU IKUSHIMA, SHUICHI KITADA, NAOFUMI TANIMOTO, KAZUHIRO HANYU, YUTAKA KOBAYASHI, MITSUHARU TOBA |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 5 | 21% |
| Unknown | 19 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,313,946
of 25,893,933 outputs
Outputs from NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI
#14
of 892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,418
of 291,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,893,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 892 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.