↓ Skip to main content

Dehumidifiers for chronic asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dehumidifiers for chronic asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003563.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meenu Singh, Nishant Jaiswal

Abstract

Humidity control measures in the home environment of patients with asthma have been recommended, since a warm humid environment favours the growth of house dust mites. However, there is no consensus about the usefulness of these measures.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 70 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 20%
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Environmental Science 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 14 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,645,852
of 15,161,635 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,264
of 11,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,292
of 157,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,161,635 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,122 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.