↓ Skip to main content

Corticosteroids for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage and primary intracerebral haemorrhage

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corticosteroids for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage and primary intracerebral haemorrhage
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004583.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valery L Feigin, Neil Anderson, Gabriel JE Rinkel, Ale Algra, Jan van Gijn, Derrick A Bennett

Abstract

Corticosteroids, particularly dexamethasone, are commonly used for treatments in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) and primary intracerebral haemorrhage (PICH) despite the lack of evidence.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 72 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 21%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Other 9 12%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Other 25 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 65%
Unspecified 9 12%
Neuroscience 8 10%
Psychology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2013.
All research outputs
#7,860,051
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,510
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,947
of 149,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#101
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.