↓ Skip to main content

The dynamics of audience applause

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of The Royal Society Interface, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 2,162)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
68 tweeters
facebook
17 Facebook pages
googleplus
8 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The dynamics of audience applause
Published in
Journal of The Royal Society Interface, August 2013
DOI 10.1098/rsif.2013.0466
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard P. Mann, Jolyon Faria, David J. T. Sumpter, Jens Krause

Abstract

The study of social identity and crowd psychology looks at how and why individual people change their behaviour in response to others. Within a group, a new behaviour can emerge first in a few individuals before it spreads rapidly to all other members. A number of mathematical models have been hypothesized to describe these social contagion phenomena, but these models remain largely untested against empirical data. We used Bayesian model selection to test between various hypotheses about the spread of a simple social behaviour, applause after an academic presentation. Individuals' probability of starting clapping increased in proportion to the number of other audience members already 'infected' by this social contagion, regardless of their spatial proximity. The cessation of applause is similarly socially mediated, but is to a lesser degree controlled by the reluctance of individuals to clap too many times. We also found consistent differences between individuals in their willingness to start and stop clapping. The social contagion model arising from our analysis predicts that the time the audience spends clapping can vary considerably, even in the absence of any differences in the quality of the presentations they have heard.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 6%
United States 4 5%
France 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
China 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 68 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 30%
Researcher 21 24%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Professor 5 6%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 1 1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 21%
Psychology 17 20%
Engineering 8 9%
Computer Science 7 8%
Physics and Astronomy 6 7%
Other 30 34%
Unknown 1 1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 220. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2019.
All research outputs
#58,657
of 13,532,334 outputs
Outputs from Journal of The Royal Society Interface
#28
of 2,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#580
of 152,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of The Royal Society Interface
#1
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,532,334 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.