↓ Skip to main content

Hospital Outbreak of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
119 news outlets
blogs
12 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
227 X users
patent
7 patents
facebook
27 Facebook pages
wikipedia
16 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
1034 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
839 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hospital Outbreak of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, June 2013
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1306742
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abdullah Assiri, Allison McGeer, Trish M Perl, Connie S Price, Abdullah A Al Rabeeah, Derek A T Cummings, Zaki N Alabdullatif, Maher Assad, Abdulmohsen Almulhim, Hatem Makhdoom, Hossam Madani, Rafat Alhakeem, Jaffar A Al-Tawfiq, Matthew Cotten, Simon J Watson, Paul Kellam, Alimuddin I Zumla, Ziad A Memish

Abstract

In September 2012, the World Health Organization reported the first cases of pneumonia caused by the novel Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). We describe a cluster of health care-acquired MERS-CoV infections.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 227 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 839 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Gambia 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Other 8 <1%
Unknown 811 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 130 15%
Student > Master 123 15%
Student > Bachelor 89 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 85 10%
Other 57 7%
Other 185 22%
Unknown 170 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 235 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 100 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 65 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 32 4%
Other 160 19%
Unknown 209 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1235. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2023.
All research outputs
#11,273
of 25,576,275 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#527
of 32,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37
of 209,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#5
of 322 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 322 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.