↓ Skip to main content

Hospital Outbreak of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
119 news outlets
blogs
12 blogs
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
228 X users
patent
7 patents
facebook
27 Facebook pages
wikipedia
16 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
1051 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
849 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hospital Outbreak of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, June 2013
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1306742
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abdullah Assiri, Allison McGeer, Trish M Perl, Connie S Price, Abdullah A Al Rabeeah, Derek A T Cummings, Zaki N Alabdullatif, Maher Assad, Abdulmohsen Almulhim, Hatem Makhdoom, Hossam Madani, Rafat Alhakeem, Jaffar A Al-Tawfiq, Matthew Cotten, Simon J Watson, Paul Kellam, Alimuddin I Zumla, Ziad A Memish

Abstract

In September 2012, the World Health Organization reported the first cases of pneumonia caused by the novel Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). We describe a cluster of health care-acquired MERS-CoV infections.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 228 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 849 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Gambia 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Other 8 <1%
Unknown 822 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 131 15%
Student > Master 123 14%
Student > Bachelor 89 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 86 10%
Other 58 7%
Other 184 22%
Unknown 178 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 234 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 100 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 65 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 32 4%
Other 160 19%
Unknown 218 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1239. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2023.
All research outputs
#12,034
of 26,756,610 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#547
of 33,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36
of 212,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#4
of 322 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,756,610 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 124.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 322 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.