You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Expression of bacterial cysteine biosynthesis genes in transgenic mice and sheep: toward a newin vivo amino acid biosynthesis pathway and improved wool growth
|
---|---|
Published in |
Transgenic Research, March 1995
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf01969411 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
C. S. Bawden, A. V. Sivaprasad, P. J. Verma, S. K. Walker, G. E. Rogers |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 33% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
Researcher | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 56% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 22% |
Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,512,050
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Transgenic Research
#367
of 893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,523
of 24,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transgenic Research
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 24,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.