↓ Skip to main content

Social inequalities and vaccination coverage: utilization of household surveys

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social inequalities and vaccination coverage: utilization of household surveys
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, May 2008
DOI 10.1590/s1415-790x2008000500011
Authors

José Cassio de Moraes, Manoel Carlos Sampaio de Almeida Ribeiro

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 40%
Social Sciences 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2024.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
#96
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,529
of 96,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.