↓ Skip to main content

Global and regional dissemination and evolution of Burkholderia pseudomallei

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Microbiology, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
20 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global and regional dissemination and evolution of Burkholderia pseudomallei
Published in
Nature Microbiology, January 2017
DOI 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.263
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire Chewapreecha, Matthew T. G. Holden, Minna Vehkala, Niko Välimäki, Zhirong Yang, Simon R. Harris, Alison E. Mather, Apichai Tuanyok, Birgit De Smet, Simon Le Hello, Chantal Bizet, Mark Mayo, Vanaporn Wuthiekanun, Direk Limmathurotsakul, Rattanaphone Phetsouvanh, Brian G. Spratt, Jukka Corander, Paul Keim, Gordon Dougan, David A. B. Dance, Bart J. Currie, Julian Parkhill, Sharon J. Peacock

Abstract

The environmental bacterium Burkholderia pseudomallei causes an estimated 165,000 cases of human melioidosis per year worldwide and is also classified as a biothreat agent. We used whole genome sequences of 469 B. pseudomallei isolates from 30 countries collected over 79 years to explore its geographic transmission. Our data point to Australia as an early reservoir, with transmission to Southeast Asia followed by onward transmission to South Asia and East Asia. Repeated reintroductions were observed within the Malay Peninsula and between countries bordered by the Mekong River. Our data support an African origin of the Central and South American isolates with introduction of B. pseudomallei into the Americas between 1650 and 1850, providing a temporal link with the slave trade. We also identified geographically distinct genes/variants in Australasian or Southeast Asian isolates alone, with virulence-associated genes being among those over-represented. This provides a potential explanation for clinical manifestations of melioidosis that are geographically restricted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 134 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 23%
Researcher 27 20%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Master 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 26 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 32 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,221,179
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from Nature Microbiology
#1,089
of 2,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,601
of 422,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Microbiology
#27
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 95.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.