↓ Skip to main content

Simple extraction methods that prevent the artifactual conversion of chlorophyll to chlorophyllide during pigment isolation from leaf samples

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
229 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Simple extraction methods that prevent the artifactual conversion of chlorophyll to chlorophyllide during pigment isolation from leaf samples
Published in
Plant Methods, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-4811-9-19
Pubmed ID
Abstract

When conducting plant research, the measurement of photosynthetic pigments can provide basic information on the physiological status of a plant. High-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) is becoming widely used for this purpose because it provides an accurate determination of a variety of photosynthetic pigments simultaneously. This technique has a drawback compared with conventional spectroscopic techniques, however, in that it is more prone to structural modification of pigments during extraction, thus potentially generating erroneous results. During pigment extraction procedures with acetone or alcohol, the phytol side chain of chlorophyll is sometimes removed, forming chlorophyllide, which affects chlorophyll measurement using HPLC.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Cuba 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 218 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 30%
Student > Bachelor 38 17%
Student > Master 31 14%
Researcher 28 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 35 15%
Unknown 18 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 110 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 14%
Chemistry 22 10%
Environmental Science 11 5%
Engineering 6 3%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 26 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2013.
All research outputs
#3,680,241
of 13,431,224 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#197
of 581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,297
of 152,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,431,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.