↓ Skip to main content

Experimental violation of a Bell's inequality with efficient detection

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, February 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
21 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
819 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
421 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experimental violation of a Bell's inequality with efficient detection
Published in
Nature, February 2001
DOI 10.1038/35057215
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. A. Rowe, D. Kielpinski, V. Meyer, C. A. Sackett, W. M. Itano, C. Monroe, D. J. Wineland

Abstract

Local realism is the idea that objects have definite properties whether or not they are measured, and that measurements of these properties are not affected by events taking place sufficiently far away. Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen used these reasonable assumptions to conclude that quantum mechanics is incomplete. Starting in 1965, Bell and others constructed mathematical inequalities whereby experimental tests could distinguish between quantum mechanics and local realistic theories. Many experiments have since been done that are consistent with quantum mechanics and inconsistent with local realism. But these conclusions remain the subject of considerable interest and debate, and experiments are still being refined to overcome 'loopholes' that might allow a local realistic interpretation. Here we have measured correlations in the classical properties of massive entangled particles (9Be+ ions): these correlations violate a form of Bell's inequality. Our measured value of the appropriate Bell's 'signal' is 2.25 +/- 0.03, whereas a value of 2 is the maximum allowed by local realistic theories of nature. In contrast to previous measurements with massive particles, this violation of Bell's inequality was obtained by use of a complete set of measurements. Moreover, the high detection efficiency of our apparatus eliminates the so-called 'detection' loophole.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 421 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 9 2%
United States 8 2%
United Kingdom 6 1%
Canada 5 1%
India 2 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 381 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 128 30%
Researcher 88 21%
Student > Master 34 8%
Professor 33 8%
Student > Bachelor 27 6%
Other 66 16%
Unknown 45 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 304 72%
Engineering 20 5%
Computer Science 8 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Chemistry 5 1%
Other 28 7%
Unknown 49 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 183. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2024.
All research outputs
#218,112
of 25,351,219 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#12,780
of 97,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194
of 126,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#5
of 425 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,351,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 425 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.