↓ Skip to main content

Glucocorticoids for acute viral bronchiolitis in infants and young children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Glucocorticoids for acute viral bronchiolitis in infants and young children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004878.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ricardo M Fernandes, Liza M Bialy, Ben Vandermeer, Lisa Tjosvold, Amy C Plint, Hema Patel, David W Johnson, Terry P Klassen, Lisa Hartling

Abstract

Previous systematic reviews have not shown clear benefit of glucocorticoids for acute viral bronchiolitis, but their use remains considerable. Recent large trials add substantially to current evidence and suggest novel glucocorticoid-including treatment approaches.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 249 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 16%
Student > Bachelor 39 15%
Researcher 31 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 11%
Student > Postgraduate 27 10%
Other 67 26%
Unknown 24 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 167 65%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 21 8%
Unknown 34 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2019.
All research outputs
#836,497
of 14,083,757 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,588
of 10,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,370
of 153,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,083,757 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.