↓ Skip to main content

Birth Weight in Different Etiologies of Disorders of Sex Development

Overview of attention for article published in JCEM, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Birth Weight in Different Etiologies of Disorders of Sex Development
Published in
JCEM, January 2017
DOI 10.1210/jc.2016-3460
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sukran Poyrazoglu, Feyza Darendeliler, S. Faisal Ahmed, Ieuan Hughes, Jillian Bryce, Jipu Jiang, Martina Rodie, Olaf Hiort, Sabine E. Hannema, Silvano Bertelloni, Lidka Lisa, Tulay Guran, Martine Cools, An Desloovere, Hedi L. Claahsen-van der Grinten, Anna Nordenstrom, Paul-Martin Holterhus, Birgit Kohler, Marek Niedziela, Nils Krone

Abstract

It is well established that boys are heavier than girls at birth. Although the cause of birth weight (BW) difference is unknown, it has been proposed that it could be generated from prenatal androgen action. The aim of the current study was to determine the BW of children with disorders of sex development (DSD) of different etiologies and to evaluate the effects of androgen action on BW. Data regarding diagnosis, BW, gestational age, karyotype, and concomitant conditions were collected from the International Disorders of Sex Development (I-DSD) Registry (www.i-dsd). BW standard deviation score was calculated according to gestational age. Cases were evaluated according to disorder classification in I-DSD (i.e., disorders of gonadal development, androgen excess, androgen synthesis, androgen action, nonspecific disorder of undermasculinization groups, and Leydig cell defect). A total of 533 cases were available; 400 (75%) cases were 46,XY, and 133 (25%) cases were 46,XX. Eighty cases (15%) were born small for gestational age (SGA). Frequency of SGA was higher in the 46,XY group (17.8%) than in the 46,XX (6.7%) group (P = 0.001). Mean BW standard deviation scores of cases with androgen excess and androgen deficiency [in disorders of gonadal development, androgen synthesis, and Leydig cell defect groups and androgen receptor gene (AR) mutation-positive cases in disorders of androgen action groups] were similar to normal children with the same karyotype. SGA birth frequency was higher in the AR mutation-negative cases in disorders of androgen action group and in the nonspecific disorders of the undermasculinization group. BW dimorphism is unlikely to be explained by fetal androgen action per se. 46,XY DSDs due to nonspecific disorders of undermasculinization are more frequently associated with fetal growth restriction, SGA, and concomitant conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 20%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Other 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 12 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2017.
All research outputs
#16,073,220
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from JCEM
#11,850
of 15,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,872
of 421,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JCEM
#65
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.