↓ Skip to main content

Fototerapia simples versus dupla no tratamento de recém-nascidos a termo com hiperbilirrubinemia não-hemolítica

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal de Pediatria, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 205)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fototerapia simples versus dupla no tratamento de recém-nascidos a termo com hiperbilirrubinemia não-hemolítica
Published in
Jornal de Pediatria, October 2009
DOI 10.1590/s0021-75572009000500015
Authors

Ignacia Silva, Matías Luco, Jose L. Tapia, María Eugenia Pérez, José Antonio Salinas, Javiera Flores, Luis Villaroel

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2012.
All research outputs
#1,649,434
of 7,027,828 outputs
Outputs from Jornal de Pediatria
#28
of 205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,874
of 88,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal de Pediatria
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,027,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 205 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them